🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."